|
Smriti-nyaya-virodha-parihara forms the topic of the first Pada. The
Smritivirodha is dealt with in Sutras 1-3 and 12 also. The Nyayavirodha
is treated in the rest of the Sutras. Pada (Section) 2 attacks the various
Darsanas or systems of philosophy on their own grounds. The Third and
Fourth Padas aim at establishing a unity of purport in the apparently
divergent and inconsistent cosmological and psychological thoughts of
the several Vedanta passages. Thus the title Avirodha or absence of
contradiction given to the chapter is quite appropriate.
It has been shown in the First Chapter that the Omniscient Lord of all
is the cause of the origin of the world just as clay is the material
cause of pots etc., and gold of golden ornaments. It has been conclusively
proved also in the First Chapter that all the Vedanta texts treat of
Brahman as the First Cause and that Brahman is the import of all the
Vedanta texts. This was established by the Samanvaya.
Just as the magician is the cause of the subsistence of the magical
illusion, so also Brahman is the cause of the subsistence of this universe
by His Rulership. Just as the four classes of creatures are reabsorbed
into the earth, so also, projected world is finally reabsorbed into
His essence during Pralaya or dissolution.
It has been further proved also that the Lord is the Self of all beings.
The doctrine of Pradhana being the
cause of the world has been refuted in the First Chapter as it is not
based on the authority of the scriptures.
In this Section the arguments based on reasoning against the doctrine
which speaks of Brahman as the First Cause are refuted. Further arguments
which claim their authoritativeness from the Smritis to establish the
doctrine of Pradhana and the theory of the atoms are refuted in this
Section.
SYNOPSIS
Previously it has been proved on the authority of Sruti that the matter
or Pradhana is not the cause of the world. The First Chapter has proved
that all the Vedantic texts unanimously teach that there is only one
cause of the universe, viz., Brahman, whose nature is intelligence.
It has also been proved that there is no scriptural text which can be
used to establish systems opposed to the Vedanta, more particularly
the Sankhya system.
The first two Padas of the Second Chapter refute any objections which
may be raised against the Vedanta doctrine on purely speculative grounds
apart from the authority of the Srutis. They also show that no system
that cannot be reconciled with the Vedanta can be established in a satisfactory
manner.
Section I (Pada) of the Second Chapter proves by arguments that Brahman
is the cause of the world and removes all objections that may be levelled
against such conclusion.
Adhikarana I: (Sutras 1-2) refutes the objection of the Sankhyas
that the accepting of the system of Vedanta involves the rejection of
the Sankhya doctrine which constitutes a part of Smriti and so has claims
or consideration. The Vedanta replies that the acceptance of the Sankhya
Smriti would force us to reject other Smritis such as the Manu Smriti
which are opposed to the doctrine of the Sankhyas. The Veda does not
confirm the Sankhya Smriti but only those Smritis which teach that the
universe takes its origin from an intelligent creator or intelligent
primary cause (Brahman).
Adhikarana II: (Sutra 3) extends the same line of argumentation
to the Yoga-Smriti. It discards the theory of the Yoga philosophy of
Patanjali regarding the cause of the world.
Adhikarana III: (Sutras 4-5) raises an objection that as Brahman
and the world are not similar in nature and properties, one being sentient,
etc., and the other insentient, etc., Brahman cannot be the cause of
the universe.
Adhikarana III: (Sutras 6-7) refutes the objection by stating that
there are instances in the world of generation of the inanimate from
the animate as, for instance, the production of hair from the living
body, also of the animate from the inanimate as, for instance, the birth
of scorpions and other insects from cow-dung. They prove that it is
not necessary that the cause and the caused should be similar in all
respects.
Adhikarana III: (Sutra 8) raises an objection that at the time of
general dissolution, when the effect (world) is merged in the cause
(Brahman), the latter must be contaminated by the former.
Adhikarana III: (Sutra 9) refutes the objection by showing that
there are direct instances to the contrary, just as the products of
the earth such as jars etc., at the time of dissolution do not change
earth into their own nature; but, on the contrary, they are themselves
changed into the substance of earth.
Adhikarana III: (Sutras
10-11), Adhikarana IV: (Sutra
12), Adhikarana IX: (Sutra 29) show that arguments directed against
the view that Brahman is the cause of the world may be levelled against
the opponents as well, such as the Sankhyas and the Vaiseshikas, because
in the Sankhya system, the nameless Pradhana produces all names and
forms and in the Vaiseshika system invisible and formless atoms unite
and form a visible world. The Sutras state that arguments may be prolonged
without any conclusion being arrived at and that the conclusion of the
Vedas only is to be respected. All the views which are antagonistic
to the Vedas are ruthlessly refuted.
Adhikarana V: (Sutra 13) teaches that although the enjoying souls
and the objects are in reality nothing but Brahman, yet they may practically
be held apart, just as in ordinary life we hold apart and distinguish
as separate individual things, the waves, the ripples and foam of the
ocean although they are in essence identical and only sea water.
Adhikarana VI: (Sutras 14-20) treats of the non-difference of the
effect from the cause, a doctrine of the Vedanta which is defended by
the followers of the Vedanta against the Vaiseshikas. According to the
Vaiseshikas, the effect is something different from the cause.
Adhikarana VII: (Sutras 21-22) refutes the objection that Brahman
in the form of the individual soul is subject to pleasure and pain by
showing that though Brahman assumes the form of the individual soul,
yet He transcends the latter and remains untainted by any property of
Jiva whom He controls from within. Though the individual soul or Jiva
is no other than Brahman Himself, yet Brahman remains the absolute Lord
and as such above pleasure and pain. Jiva is a slave of Avidya. Brahman
is the controller of Maya. When Jiva is freed from Avidya, he becomes
identical with Brahman.
Adhikarana VIII: (Sutras 23-25) shows that Brahman, although devoid
of material and instruments of action, may yet create the world through
His Sat-Sankalpa or will power, just as gods by their mere power of
volition create palaces, animals and the like and milk by itself turns
into curds.
Adhikarana IX: (Sutras 26-29) explains that Brahman does not entirely
transform Himself into the universe though He is without parts. Although
He projects the world from Himself, yet He remains one and undivided.
The world is unreal. The change is only apparent like the snake is the
rope but not real. Brahman is not exhausted in the creation.
Adhikarana X: (Sutras 30-31) teaches that Brahman, although devoid
of instruments of action, is able to create the universe by means of
the diverse powers He possesses.
Adhikarana XI: (Sutras 32-33) explains that Brahman has no motive
in creating the world but projects the universe out of mere sporting
impulse which is inherent in Him.
Adhikarana XII: (Sutras 34-36) justifies Brahman from the charges
of partiality and cruelty which are brought against Him owing to the
inequality of position and fate of the various persons and the universal
suffering in the world. Brahman acts as a creator and dispenser with
reference to the merit and demerit of the individual souls.
Adhikarana XIII: (Sutra 37) sums up the preceding arguments and
states that all the attributes of Brahman, viz., Omniscience, Omnipotence
and the like, are found appropriate in Brahman alone and none else and
are such as to capacitate Him for the creation of the universe. Brahman
is, therefore, the cause of the world.
|