|
The Dissertation on Experience
The world is a presentation of outward variety and seeming contradiction
in existence. It is a disintegrated appearance of the Absolute, a limited
expression of Infinitude, a degeneration of the majesty of immortal
Consciousness, a diffused form of the spiritual Completeness, a dissipated
manifestation of changeless Eternity. Each of such separated entities of the
world claims for itself an absolutely independent existence and regards all
objective individuals as the not-Self. The not-Self is always considered to be
in absolute contradiction to or at least absolutely distinguished from the self's
own localised being. The exclusion of other limited objective bodies from one's
own subjective self involves a relation between the two, and this relation is
the force that keeps intact the network of diverse consciousness. Everything
hangs on the other thing for its subsistence through contact. A lack of the
character of self-sufficiency discloses the deceitful nature of the relative
reality of things marked off within themselves. The obvious fact that every
demarcated entity expresses within itself an urge to relate itself to other
objective beings through internal psychoses and sense-operations points out the
inability and impossibility of individualised centres of consciousness to
maintain the apparent truth of their professed self-existence. The universe
rolls on ceaselessly in the cycle of time, and reveals a newer characteristic
of itself every moment. Things do not rest in themselves but ever pass away
into something else. Everything in this universe is change. Change is the law
of life. Nothing is without changing itself. An inadequacy felt in the
attainments of the current state of existence is the forerunner of all
enterprises in the life of the individual. Action is impossible unless the self
feels in itself a deficiency which can be filled up by an active endeavour to
possess the missing part that would contribute to the completion of its nature.
A felt necessity for a fuller state of experience is the mother of all
attractions and repulsions. The whole cosmos seems to be a restless field where
dynamic powers are arrayed in battle as if to extirpate themselves for a nobler
cause. Tranquillity can well be said to be non-existent in the history of the
space-time world. Struggle is the meaning of phenomenal endurance. The
Upanishads solve the riddle of relative strife through the intuitive perception
of the Essence. The heroic leap of the individual into the unknown is the
expression of the want of a superior joy. The dissatisfaction with limitedness
in life directs the soul to catch the fullness of perfection in the truth of
its Integrality, with which the individualised condition is not endowed. Hence,
universal movement and individual effort, though differing in their altruism of
nature, can be understood as a reflection of the tendency to Self-Perfection of
Being. The pressure of the truth of the absoluteness of consciousness is the
source of the force that compels individuals to transcend their finitude and
find their eternal repose in it alone. This permanent Verity is the supreme
object of quest through the cosmical endeavour in creation, wherein alone all
further impulses for externalisation of forces are put an end to. The desire to
become the All terminates in the experience of Infinitude. This aspiration to
transcend states and things points to the unreal character of the universe.
"The one Being, the wise diversely speak of." -Rig-Veda, I. 164. 46.
"There is nothing diverse here." -Katha Up. IV. 11.
"Existence is One alone without a second." -Chh. Up. VI. 2.1.
The life of every individual bears connections with the lives of other
individuals in varieties of ways, in accordance with the degree of its
awareness of Reality. Every thought sets the surface of existence in vibration
and touches the psychic life of other individuals with a creative force the
capability of action of which is dependent on the intensity of the affirmation
of the mind generating that thought. Objects entirely cut off from one another
can have no relation among themselves. Sense-perception, cogitation and
understanding are messengers of the fact that there exists a fundamental
substratum of a uniform and enduring Consciousness. Cognition is impossible
without a pre-existent link between the subject and the object. Thought cannot
spring from emptiness, for emptiness is itself nothing. Activity is possible
because there is creative imagination and imagination is a moving objectified
shadow of Consciousness. The denial or assertion of something presupposes the
awareness of the thinking subject and the subject cannot stand apart from
self-awareness. Self-consciousness is, thus, unavoidable in being. It is an
eternal fact. The perception of an object reveals the conscious relation that
is between the subject and the object. This relation should be based on a
fundamentally changeless being, without which even a relation is not possible.
All contacts presuppose an immovable ground which supports all movements.
The world is made up of forms. The forms of things disclose their unreal
nature when subjected to a careful examination of their composition and
working. A thing is a member of the society of diverse phenomenal centres
appearing to divide against itself a basic Noumenon. A thing is an object of
thought, an internal form, and an external form is known through thought
itself, which is consciousness objectified. A form is differentiated from
existence as a whole by a particular mode characterising it. It cannot be said
that a thing is defined by a mode or that it has a definite form unless it
becomes an object of thought. Thought itself is conditioned by forms, and it is
thought, again, that knows external forms and determines their nature. The laws
governing the modes of thinking shall have sway over its objects also, for the
rules that regulate the process of knowledge and restrict its operations
determine all the contents thereof, which, therefore, cannot be known
independent of and free from the conditions to which the knowing process is
subject. All forms of objective knowledge are, thus, deceptive and give to the
knower nothing of reality. The truth of the object of thought can be known only
when it is freed from the modes of thought, and the truth of thought itself can
be known only when it is not conditioned by the forms which it takes. Neither
the mind nor its object, taken independently, can be said to truly exist. That
the mind exists cannot be proved unless there is a modification of the modal
consciousness, which is called a psychosis or a mental transformation, which,
again, is not possible without the mind's taking the form of an object or an
objective condition. That objects exist also cannot be proved unless there are
minds to cognise and know them. Each is explained only by the other and not by
itself. Nothing in this world, neither the subject nor the object, is
independent and self-existent. The test of reality is non-dependence,
completeness and imperishability. When things are judged from this standard of
truth, the phenomenal subjectivity and objectivity in them are found to break
down and reveal their ultimate unreality. The appearance of the
subject-object-distinction has to be finally attributed to the creative
activity of consciousness itself, though the relation of consciousness and
change in the form of any activity is beyond understanding and explanation. As
the idea of causality itself is an effect of the want of real knowledge, a question
as to the cause of this want has no meaning. But the affirmation of
consciousness has to objectify itself in the form in which it is desired to
manifest itself, as all forms are contents of consciousness. Whatever an
individual affirms must ultimately happen or be materialised into effect,
because each centre of consciousness has infinity at its background. Misery or
suffering and pleasure or happiness are experiences relative to the
understanding of the individual, and are of such a character and degree as is
the condition of the individual consciousness in relation to the Absolute
Being. There is really one experience which is absolute, and it can be
styled neither a misery nor a pleasure. That One Experience is diversely felt
as variety, and is fictitiously termed as either this or that, and of this
nature or of that. The form of the world is found to be a magical appearance
when subjected to the test of severe discrimination. The world and the Atman or
Brahman neither exclude nor include each other, but are non-related, for
relation is possible only between two demarcated objects, and the possibility
of duality or any relation is annulled in the being that is "one alone without
a second." Pure Experience is attributeless, and all "existence" is "experience".
Ethical virtues and immoral vices are the effects of the different mental modes
reacting variegatedly to the one changeless consciousness in different ways,
leading respectively to the experience of Unity-consciousness and
diversity-delusion. All our experiences are relative, and neither the relative
experiencer nor the experienced can stand the test of reality. They present an
appearance, though the reality in them transcends them and exists as an
indivisible unity. This one Reality appears as the knower as well as the known.
It is one and the same thing that appears as the earth to certain states of
consciousness, as heaven to some, as hell to certain other, as men and
creatures to still some other, and as Eternal Consciousness to another that is
integrated. The Substance is One and it is felt by different modes of mentation
in their own fashion, as good, bad, sweet, bitter, beautiful, ugly and the
like. The Substance by itself does not change; only the mode of perception
changes. The truth therefore remains that Eternal Existence is without any
evolution or involution within itself From this it follows that the world of
space and time is an appearance, a shadow of Reality. Even immortality and
death are relative to the individual. In order to have the Experience of
Reality we have to discard the forms as mere appearances.
|