|

Sarvabhedadanyatreme
III.3.10 (369)
On account of the non-difference
(of the Vidya) everywhere (i.e., in all the texts of the different
Sakhas where the Prana-Vidya occurs) these qualities (mentioned in
two of them are to be inserted) in the other places (e.g., the Kaushitaki
Upanishad).
Sarvabhedat: on account of non-difference everywhere; Anyatra:
in the other places; Ime: these (qualities are to be inserted).
A concrete instance on the general principle of Sutra 5 is cited.
In the colloquy of the Pranas recorded by the Vajasaneyins and the Chhandogyas,
the Prana which is endowed with various qualities such as being the
best and so on, is represented as the object of meditation. Various
qualities such as being the richest and the like are ascribed to speech
and the other organs. These latter qualities are in the end attributed
to the Prana also. "If I am the richest thou art the richest."
Now in other Sakhas also, as e.g., that of the Kaushitakins the set
of qualities such as being the best and so on is attributed to the Prana
(Katha Up. II.14). But the set of attributes, viz., being the richest
and so on is not mentioned.
The question is whether they are to be inserted in the Kaushitaki also,
where they are not mentioned.
This Sutra declares that they have to be inserted, as the Vidya is the
same in all the three Upanishads. Attributes belonging to one and the
same Vidya or subject have to be combined wherever that Vidya occurs
although they may not be expressly stated.
|